![]() The ‘spike protein’ mentioned above is explained by Dr Seamus Lennon here, in relation to mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines: ![]() “It’s a literal ‘covid rash’ and can only be gotten if you are in close proximity to someone who got recently vaccinated and you’re sharing bodily fluids.” The same woman who made this claim said that some unvaccinated people had experienced strange bruising caused by ‘shedding’ from vaccinated people, and that pets had died after being exposed to vaccinated people. One claim being made is that the vaccine is “coming out through breath… through pores”. Some proponents of the claim believe that those who have not had the vaccine should stay away from people who’ve been vaccinated. No claims we saw described the person experiencing Covid-19 symptoms. The claims we have seen online typically say that a person who has been unvaccinated can experience symptoms such as rashes, nose bleeds or irregular periods after being in contact with a vaccinated person. The claims typically posit that vaccinated people can ‘shed’ the vaccine, and that by spending time with vaccinated people, unvaccinated people can become ill, experiencing symptoms like nose bleeds or irregular menstrual cycles. This is part of The Associated Press’ ongoing effort to fact-check misinformation that is shared widely online, including work with Facebook to identify and reduce the circulation of false stories on the platform.CLAIMS ARE BEING made and shared online that the Covid-19 vaccines can affect the health of people who have not been vaccinated, just by being around people who have received a vaccination. Mullane, director of infectious diseases clinical trials and professor of medicine at the University of Chicago. ![]() “It is very easy for these people, who have no understanding of the rigorous regulations and processes involved in undertaking the conduct of a clinical trial and have never been involved in the conduct of a trial to, in isolation, comment on the standard handling processes of investigational products out of context,” said Kathleen M. The AP has previously debunked that false theory. At this stage of research, however, she said: “ We know that it really does not affect fertility at all.”įalse posts have misinterpreted this protocol document as evidence that unvaccinated people - particularly pregnant women - should keep away from people vaccinated against COVID-19. “Initially, you might not potentially know whether any of the vaccine is actually getting into the semen, if any of the semen are affected,” Swaminathan said. Regarding the document’s guidelines requiring reporting if a vaccinated man potentially exposes a woman “ around the time of conception,” Swaminathan said the language is meant to gather information on any type of exposure before the risks are known. Swaminathan told The Associated Press that “exposure” through inhalation or skin contact could refer to incidents where a pregnant woman was near a syringe that contained the product and accidentally broke.īut in the case of COVID-19 vaccines, the degree of absorption from spilling the vaccine on your skin is “probably going to be negligible to non-existent,” Swaminathan said. Shobha Swaminathan, an associate professor of medicine at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, referred to the document’s language as “generic” meant to cover cases of “any potential exposures, including possible accidental ones.” “That language probably doesn’t have any relevance to this specific type of vaccine platform,” Brandt said of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which does not contain live virus.ĭr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |